
Choosing how to accept payments for software, digital products, or subscriptions is one of the most consequential decisions for developers and creators. The landscape splits into two main approaches: payment processors, which move money and leave compliance to you, and Merchant of Record (MoR) platforms, which sell on your behalf and handle tax and regulatory burden. Within the MoR category, solutions differ widely in pricing, developer experience, and target audience.
This article explains how Polar differs from other payment components—Stripe, Paddle, Lemon Squeezy, and Gumroad—so you can choose the right fit for your product and scale.
Before comparing Polar to specific providers, it helps to understand the two dominant models.
A payment processor moves money between the customer’s card and your account. It:
What stays with you: You are the seller of record. You are responsible for:
So you get maximum control and (often) lower base fees, but you carry the legal and operational burden of selling internationally.
A Merchant of Record (MoR) is the legal seller to the end customer. The MoR:
What you get: Global sales without building or maintaining tax, legal, or compliance infrastructure. The tradeoff is usually a higher all-in fee that bundles processing + MoR services.
Polar, Paddle, and Lemon Squeezy are MoR platforms. Stripe is a payment processor (though it offers add-ons like Stripe Tax for an extra cost). Gumroad operates as an MoR-style platform with its own fee and marketplace model.
Polar (polar.sh) is a complete billing infrastructure platform built for developers who monetize software. It is not “just” a payment form or a processor: it combines:
Polar is open source (Apache 2.0), with a TypeScript-first API, framework adapters (Next.js, Laravel, BetterAuth, and others), and a “6-line integration” story for supported stacks. Pricing is 4% + 40¢ per transaction with no monthly minimums; MoR and tax are included.
| Aspect | Polar | Stripe |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Merchant of Record | Payment processor |
| Base fee | 4% + 40¢ (MoR + tax included) | 2.9% + 30¢ (processing only) |
| Subscriptions | Included | +0.7% for recurring in some regions |
| Tax compliance | Included globally | Your responsibility; Stripe Tax is extra (e.g. 0.5% or 50¢/tx, or ~$90/mo for full compliance) |
| Liability | Polar (MoR) carries it | You carry it |
| Focus | Software/digital products, billing + benefits | General-purpose payments and billing |
| Integration | Framework adapters, 6-line setup for supported stacks | Flexible APIs, more custom code for full billing/tax stack |
| Open source | Yes | No |
When Stripe makes sense: You sell mainly in one or a few jurisdictions, have (or want) in-house or external support for tax and compliance, and want the lowest base processing rate and maximum control over checkout and branding.
When Polar makes sense: You want to sell software or digital products globally from day one without dealing with VAT/GST/sales tax, and you want billing + automated delivery (licenses, downloads, GitHub, Discord) in one product. Polar’s all-in fee can be lower than Stripe once you add tax compliance and operational cost.
| Aspect | Polar | Paddle |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Merchant of Record | Merchant of Record |
| Fee | 4% + 40¢ | 5% + 50¢ |
| Tax compliance | Included | Included |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Developer experience | Modern SDKs, framework adapters, 6-line integration, TypeScript-first | Mature but older tooling, closed platform |
| Transparency | Public roadmap, open codebase, full API and data portability | Closed source, roadmap and capabilities depend on vendor |
| Automated benefits | License keys, files, GitHub, Discord, etc. | Varies; Polar is built around software/digital delivery |
Paddle is an established MoR; Polar positions as a modern, developer-first alternative with roughly 20% lower fees (e.g. ~$4,000 vs ~$5,000 on $100k monthly revenue), open source, and tooling aimed at current dev stacks.
When Paddle makes sense: You prefer a long-standing, closed MoR and don’t need the lowest fee or open source.
When Polar makes sense: You want the same MoR benefits with lower cost, modern DX, and full transparency (open source, public roadmap).
| Aspect | Polar | Lemon Squeezy |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Merchant of Record | Merchant of Record |
| Fee | 4% + 40¢ | 5% + 50¢ |
| Target | Developers and teams scaling to enterprise | Solo creators, indie hackers |
| APIs and control | API-first, usage-based billing, robust webhooks, full programmatic control | Simpler, more UI-led; less scalable for complex flows |
| Integration | Framework adapters, 6-line integration, many frameworks | Ease of use, less “code-first” |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Approval | Start selling quickly | Often ~1 week account approval |
Both are MoR platforms with similar benefits (global tax, simplicity). Lemon Squeezy favors non-technical or low-code users; Polar favors developers who need advanced subscriptions, usage-based billing, and the ability to scale without migrating later.
When Lemon Squeezy makes sense: You’re a solo creator or indie hacker and want the simplest possible setup with minimal code.
When Polar makes sense: You’re a developer who wants the same simplicity at the start but with room to grow (APIs, webhooks, usage billing, entitlements) and lower fees (4% vs 5%).
| Aspect | Polar | Gumroad |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Merchant of Record | Platform / MoR-style |
| Fee | 4% + 40¢ flat | Tiered: 9% → 7% → 5% → 2.9%+30¢ by lifetime earnings; + payment processing (2.9%+30¢); international and currency fees on top |
| Effective cost | Predictable 4% + 40¢ | Often 12–16%+ for many creators when platform + processing + international are combined |
| Audience | Developers, software, SaaS, digital products | Creators, courses, templates, digital products; strong in “creator” and Notion-template space |
| Marketplace | No built-in marketplace | Discover marketplace (higher take rate for marketplace sales) |
| Developer experience | Built for devs: APIs, adapters, webhooks, entitlements | Simpler storefront and links; less API-centric |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Gumroad is well-known for creators and has a marketplace; fees can be high until you reach higher lifetime tiers. Polar targets developers and software products with a single, transparent fee and no marketplace dependency.
When Gumroad makes sense: You want a creator-focused brand, optional marketplace visibility, and are comfortable with tiered fees and higher effective cost at lower volumes.
When Polar makes sense: You sell software or dev-focused digital products and want predictable pricing, no marketplace lock-in, and strong APIs and entitlements (licenses, GitHub, Discord, files).
One price (4% + 40¢) includes payment processing and global tax. No separate tax product or monthly compliance fee.
Products and checkout are designed for digital goods and subscriptions, with automated benefits: license keys, secure downloads, GitHub repo access, Discord roles—configurable once, delivered automatically on purchase.
The codebase is open (Apache 2.0). You get transparency, the ability to self-host (with the caveat that full MoR benefits usually require the hosted service), and community-driven development.
Framework adapters (Next.js, Laravel, BetterAuth, and more), 6-line integration for supported stacks, TypeScript-first SDKs, and an API-first design for custom flows and webhooks.
About 20% lower than Paddle and Lemon Squeezy (4% + 40¢ vs 5% + 50¢), with no monthly minimums. Compared to Stripe, the effective cost can be lower when you factor in tax compliance and operational overhead.
Positioned to go from first sale to enterprise without changing providers: usage-based billing, advanced subscriptions, and full API control.
Polar sits in the Merchant of Record category alongside Paddle and Lemon Squeezy, but it is built specifically for developers and software monetization. Its differences from other payment components come down to:
If you want to sell software or digital products globally with minimal tax and delivery overhead, and you care about developer experience, transparency, and cost, Polar is designed to be a strong fit among today’s payment and billing options.

To notify Slack for AWS CodePipeline, create a notification rule for the pipeline, selecting all events and Slack as the target. Register the Slack channel as a target and configure a new chatbot client. After authorizing Slack, specify the Slack channel to connect to, set the chatbot's privileges, and establish guard rules. With read-only access for both allowed rules and guard conditions, the pipeline can trigger notifications to the Slack channel.
Beiryu
Contributor

Event-driven architecture, Reactive programming, and technologies like NodeJS, Play, and
Beiryu
Contributor